Forest Alliance Advocates Protecting Urban Forests

IFA photos

by Enrique Saenz

Every day, Indianapolis residents pass by many of the most cost-effective tools the city has to perform a variety of crucial and expensive functions: trees.

The Indiana Forest Alliance is urging Indianapolis officials to take action to protect the city’s urban forests and has presented them with a strategy to best establish those protections. The “Forests for Indy Urban Forest Protection Strategy” [PDF] highlights the steps elected officials from the Indianapolis Marion County city-county government can take to protect urban forests.

Land development, especially in environmentally sensitive areas around the city, threatens to reduce the number of urban forests and potentially shift the cost of their functions to Indianapolis and Marion County residents.

Trees provide stormwater control, filter air pollution, reduce heat, sequester carbon dioxide and provide many other services that would otherwise cost the city of Indianapolis millions of taxpayer dollars to replicate.

“If we clear them, we’re going to lose their benefits, and we’re going to pay for their loss,” said Indiana Forest Alliance executive director Jeff Stant. “Every month, every quarter in Indianapolis, more of this forest base is being clear cut, removed and chipped away at. What we’re trying to do with this project is to get out in front of that in a proactive way and develop strategies for conserving the most important of these tracts and forests in an equitable way across the city.”

According to the IFA, nearly 15% of Marion County, or about 59 square miles, is forested. Only 9 square miles of that forested land is within city property and thus under its protection.

Indianapolis forested areas – Indiana Green City Mapper Click to enlarge.

The remaining 50 square miles of forested land, including 4,237 urban forests larger than an acre, are privately owned and have few, if any, protections from being cut down, degraded or destroyed by development.

According to a Tree Management Plan [PDF] commissioned by the Indianapolis Department of Public Works, the city’s 9 square miles of trees provide nearly $10 million in annual benefits to the city, averaging about $54.54 in annual benefits per tree. Among those benefits:

  • The aesthetic qualities of trees increase property values by $26.44 a year, leading to $4.8 million in benefits to the city.
  • Trees intercept more than 536 million gallons of rainfall annually, saving the city $3.3 million in stormwater management costs.
  • The shade from tree cover reduces the amount of electricity used by air conditioners in the summer and divert wind in the winter to reduce natural gas costs, leading to an annual savings of about $1.3 million in energy consumption for the city.
  • Trees also suck up more air pollutants than they emit and sequester carbon dioxide, leading to a net gain of about $500,000 in benefits.

Privately owned trees could be providing similar benefits to Hoosiers around the city. The IFA calculated the remaining 50 square miles of unprotected forests, about 4.7 million trees, are providing nearly $258 million in similar benefits.

Despite evidence of the fiscal benefits of urban forests, Stant said the city has not made the preservation of urban forests a priority. “Every month, there are proposals approved by the Metropolitan Development Commission or the Boards of Zoning Appeals under the commission, that are allowing for developments in what the comprehensive plan of the city says are environmentally sensitive areas.”

Stant said developments are allowed to happen despite the city-county comprehensive land use plan saying those environmentally sensitive areas should be protected. The plan allows the addition of overlays, or special land use zones, that could provide special protections to high quality woodlands, wetlands or other natural resources “that should be protected.”

“What you find, if you look at most plans that the city has produced in the last decade, is a consensus that these forests are important to conserve. What’s missing is the will to implement these plans to conserve the forests,” Stant said. The IFA hopes that presenting a clear strategy for protecting urban forests may make the task more viable for elected officials.

The IFA, along with the national Conservation Fund environmental organization, inventoried the city’s urban forests and identified eight conservation strategies that would work best to protect them, including expanding the number of protected lands and trees, establishing riparian waterway buffers and wildlife habitat protection areas, and exploiting the carbon offset revenue potential. The organization also identified potential sources of funding for urban forest preservation.

Stant said the IFA has spoken to Mayor Joe Hogsett and about half of the city’s 25 city-county councillors, many of whom favor the city having some role in acquiring forests to protect them. “We know that the conservation of urban forests should be a priority to ensure that Indianapolis remains an attractive place to live, work, and play,” Hogsett said in a press release. “This plan will boost our collaboration with dedicated community partners to improve local planning and enhance equitable access to forests across our neighborhoods.”

The sentiment was shared by Indianapolis City-County Council President Vop Osili, “We must stop thinking of forests and cities as an ‘either/or’ proposition and embrace the reality that forests, great or small, are vital to the health of Indianapolis and its residents,” he said.

The IFA will present the forest inventory and strategies to the city-county council’s new Environmental Sustainability Committee Feb. 28.

Enrique Saenz is a journalist at Indiana Environmental Reporter where the full version of this article appeared.